Topic summary
47% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Infrastructure Maintenance results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 664 hits . Analysis detected 5,317 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,887 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 17% (18,831 of 22,679 topics). This Infrastructure Maintenance is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Infrastructure Maintenance
Topic details
Total words: 8,887
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst