Topic summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 1,768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indigenous Resistance results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 836 hits . Analysis detected 5,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 45% (13,248 of 23,979 topics). This Indigenous Resistance is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Indigenous Resistance
Topic details
Total words: 7,072
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst