Topic summary
⁠21%2 analyzed articles/videos992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indecent Exposure results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 486 hits. Analysis detected 2,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,606 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (12,515 of 23,769 topics). This Indecent Exposure is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Indecent Exposure
Topic details
Total words: 4,606
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos