Topic summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video1,474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illiberalism results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 897 hits. Analysis detected 4,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (13,369 of 24,545 topics). This Illiberalism is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Illiberalism
Topic details
Total words: 5,896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos