Topic summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iceland results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 137 hits . Analysis detected 996 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 64% (8,120 of 21,978 topics). This Iceland is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group. Iceland
Topic details
Total words: 1,532
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst