Topic summary
69% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Crises results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 2,897 hits . Analysis detected 15,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,799 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (17,790 of 24,545 topics). This Humanitarian Crises is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Humanitarian Crises
Topic details
Total words: 22,799
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles22.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst