Topic summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Wildlife Interaction results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 1,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (15,481 of 23,856 topics). This Human Wildlife Interaction is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Human Wildlife Interaction
Topic details
Total words: 2,960
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos