Topic summary
⁠36%3 analyzed articles/videos909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Housing Law results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 285 hits. Analysis detected 2,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,688 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (17,318 of 22,539 topics). This Housing Law is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Housing Law
Topic details
Total words: 4,688
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos