Topic summary
50%2 analyzed articles/videos2,482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hollywood Industry results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,066 hits. Analysis detected 5,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,252 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (15,926 of 23,677 topics). This Hollywood Industry is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Hollywood Industry
Topic details
Total words: 10,252
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.4%10.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos