Topic summary
15% 1 analyzed article/video 529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hearing results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 129 hits . Analysis detected 836 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (14,512 of 24,545 topics). This Hearing is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Hearing
Topic details
Total words: 2,116
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst