Topic summary
⁠53%3 analyzed articles/videos1,940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Technology results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,282 hits. Analysis detected 10,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,160 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (16,224 of 24,564 topics). This Health Technology is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Health Technology

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos