Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video1,605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Insurance Affordability results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 432 hits. Analysis detected 3,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (13,802 of 22,261 topics). This Health Insurance Affordability is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Health Insurance Affordability
Topic details
Total words: 6,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos