Topic summary
17% 5 analyzed articles/videos 9,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Disparities results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 1,421 hits . Analysis detected 12,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,148 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (23,121 of 23,414 topics). This Health Disparities is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Health Disparities
Topic details
Total words: 36,148
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 0.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles36.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst