Topic summary
⁠47%4 analyzed articles/videos3,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hazing results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 2,115 hits. Analysis detected 8,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,928 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (19,341 of 24,105 topics). This Hazing is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Hazing
Topic details
Total words: 15,928
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos