Topic summary
29% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hantavirus results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 2,210 hits . Analysis detected 13,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,215 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (21,097 of 22,487 topics). This Hantavirus is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Hantavirus
Topic details
Total words: 29,215
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles29.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst