Topic summary
8%1 analyzed article/video268 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gunfight results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 714 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,157 of 22,536 topics). This Gunfight is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Gunfight
Topic details
Total words: 1,072
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.4% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos