Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Abbott results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 236 hits. Analysis detected 1,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (10,910 of 24,545 topics). This Greg Abbott is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Greg Abbott
Topic details
Total words: 2,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos