Topic summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos1,839 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Golden State Valkyries results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 2,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,574 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (16,657 of 23,135 topics). This Golden State Valkyries is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Golden State Valkyries
Topic details
Total words: 5,574
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos