Topic summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geopolitics Of Space results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 784 faulty-reasoning hits from 512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,254 of 24,545 topics). This Geopolitics Of Space is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Geopolitics Of Space
Topic details
Total words: 512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.8% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles512 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.8%17.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.5%12.5%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%Composition/Division: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos