Topic summary
⁠72%6 analyzed articles/videos7,691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genocide results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 3,660 hits. Analysis detected 28,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,441 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (15,988 of 24,545 topics). This Genocide is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles30.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos