Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video1,743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gallery Practices results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 551 hits. Analysis detected 3,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (19,394 of 22,261 topics). This Gallery Practices is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Gallery Practices
Topic details
Total words: 6,972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos