Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fort Bend County results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 1,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (10,884 of 24,545 topics). This Fort Bend County is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Fort Bend County
Topic details
Total words: 2,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos