Topic summary
74% 10 analyzed articles/videos 10,523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These For Members results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 4,823 hits . Analysis detected 41,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,621 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (18,092 of 23,332 topics). This For Members is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. For Members
Topic details
Total words: 50,621
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score10 analyzed articles50.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst