Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video1,433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food & Beverage results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,299 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (13,553 of 23,829 topics). This Food & Beverage is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Food & Beverage
Topic details
Total words: 4,299
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos