Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flood Remembrance results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 170 faulty-reasoning hits from 360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,097 of 24,545 topics). This Flood Remembrance is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Flood Remembrance
Topic details
Total words: 360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.4% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles360 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 8.6%8.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos