Topic summary
⁠63%3 analyzed articles/videos2,888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fire Safety results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,216 hits. Analysis detected 10,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,552 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (12,888 of 22,261 topics). This Fire Safety is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Fire Safety
Topic details
Total words: 11,552
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos