Topic summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financials results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 2,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (8,925 of 24,545 topics). This Financials is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Financials
Topic details
Total words: 3,224
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos