Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Female Athletes results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 603 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 22,667 topics). This Female Athletes is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Female Athletes
Topic details
Total words: 1,044
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 17.5% 17.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst