Topic summary
⁠92%2 analyzed articles/videos1,546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Travel results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 1,190 hits. Analysis detected 6,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,184 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (7,560 of 24,545 topics). This Family Travel is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Family Travel
Topic details
Total words: 6,184
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.2%19.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos