Topic summary
80% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Law results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,901 hits . Analysis detected 14,442 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,898 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 30% (17,403 of 24,545 topics). This Family Law is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Family Law
Topic details
Total words: 18,898
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst