Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Extreme Endurance results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 570 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (12,349 of 24,545 topics). This Extreme Endurance is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Extreme Endurance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos