Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Privilege results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 1,111 hits. Analysis detected 5,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,801 of 22,159 topics). This Executive Privilege is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Executive Privilege
Topic details
Total words: 3,896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.4% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.5%28.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.4%18.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.8%13.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.1%24.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos