Topic summary
⁠15%5 analyzed articles/videos5,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Event Planning results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Indoctrination, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 737 hits. Analysis detected 6,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,996 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (24,011 of 24,407 topics). This Event Planning is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Event Planning

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

2% percentile
02550751001.6% percentile
0.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles25K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos