Topic summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video1,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epic Poetry results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 715 hits. Analysis detected 2,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (14,020 of 23,921 topics). This Epic Poetry is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Epic Poetry
Topic details
Total words: 5,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos