Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Technology results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 1,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (7,236 of 24,564 topics). This Energy Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Energy Technology
Topic details
Total words: 2,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.9%13.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.3%18.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos