Topic summary
88% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endangered Species Act results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 2,736 hits . Analysis detected 25,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,989 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 42% (13,934 of 23,829 topics). This Endangered Species Act is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Endangered Species Act
Topic details
Total words: 24,989
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles25K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst