Topic summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electronic Warfare results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 854 hits. Analysis detected 5,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (5,846 of 24,545 topics). This Electronic Warfare is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Electronic Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 3,960
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 21.6%21.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.3%11.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos