Topic summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These El Farolito Sc results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 1,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (5,996 of 23,460 topics). This El Farolito Sc is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
El Farolito Sc
Topic details
Total words: 1,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.3%20.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos