Topic summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Education Law results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 463 hits . Analysis detected 4,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 40% (14,741 of 24,545 topics). This Education Law is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Education Law
Topic details
Total words: 5,208
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst