Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Impact Of Wildfires results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 799 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (9,371 of 23,917 topics). This Economic Impact Of Wildfires is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Economic Impact Of Wildfires
Topic details
Total words: 1,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Middle Ground: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos