Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dietary Trends results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 4,228 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,011 of 24,545 topics). This Dietary Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Dietary Trends
Topic details
Total words: 2,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.8%17.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos