Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video983 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deepmind's Weathernext Model results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 1,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (18,552 of 24,545 topics). This Deepmind's Weathernext Model is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Deepmind's Weathernext Model
Topic details
Total words: 3,932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos