Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video4,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Day Trip Destinations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 1,316 hits. Analysis detected 7,259 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (18,916 of 23,944 topics). This Day Trip Destinations is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Day Trip Destinations
Topic details
Total words: 17,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos