Topic summary
6% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dark Money Groups results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 185 hits . Analysis detected 1,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,676 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (22,470 of 24,545 topics). This Dark Money Groups is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Dark Money Groups
Topic details
Total words: 5,676
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst