Topic summary
⁠15%2 analyzed articles/videos1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyberstalking results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 395 hits. Analysis detected 1,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,084 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (16,819 of 21,940 topics). This Cyberstalking is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Cyberstalking
Topic details
Total words: 5,084
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos