Topic summary
32% 1 analyzed article/video 843 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybersecurity Best Practices results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 190 hits . Analysis detected 1,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 21% (19,507 of 24,567 topics). This Cybersecurity Best Practices is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Cybersecurity Best Practices
Topic details
Total words: 3,372
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Middle Ground: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst