Topic summary
76%2 analyzed articles/videos4,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cultural Analysis results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 3,502 hits. Analysis detected 16,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (13,092 of 22,501 topics). This Cultural Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Cultural Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 16,872
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.8%20.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos