Topic summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cultural Analysis results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 3,502 hits . Analysis detected 16,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (13,092 of 22,501 topics). This Cultural Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Cultural Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 16,872
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 20.8% 20.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst