Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Creative Economy results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,654 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 24,569 topics). This Creative Economy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Creative Economy
Topic details
Total words: 3,654
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst