Topic summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos1,316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Spending results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 803 hits. Analysis detected 3,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,047 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (13,917 of 24,569 topics). This Corporate Spending is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Corporate Spending
Topic details
Total words: 5,047
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos