Topic summary
⁠99%2 analyzed articles/videos1,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Profits results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 1,534 hits. Analysis detected 10,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (3,190 of 22,327 topics). This Corporate Profits is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Corporate Profits
Topic details
Total words: 5,196
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
5.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.5%29.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 20.5%20.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 20.2%20.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.2%12.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos